Guest Hekima blogger, Louise Umutoni |
With knowledge comes responsibility, for
how then can you explain the very popular saying “Ignorance is bliss”. I have
since come to realize the full extent of this saying and in a twisted sort of
way looked at my days of ignorance with a certain sense of longing. Ignorance
is bliss because knowledge imposes on you a sense of responsibility. Nietzsche
once alluded to this, albeit on a different issue, and his had to do with a
world that chose to deny the existence of God, a world in which man became God,
the “Ubermensch” or super man, as he referred to this godlike man. Nietzsche
believed that with this disregard for God, comes responsibility to fill the
very big shoes that God had previously filled. Man had to define notions such
as morality on his own terms, notions that were bound to be contested by all
involved. Unlike many existentialists and atheists he bore no disillusionment
of the prefect godless world. Of course one should not attempt to associate Nietzsche’s
view on this with his take on faith or religion, Nietzsche did not believe in
God. However what I admire about him was that he was wise enough to point out
the inherent problems that were bound to plague the godless world, the
responsibility that came with this decision. His was a life spent trying to
fill that void left by the denouncing of God.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c08a/4c08a36fa2191e68f113cea6c9d15a81c82f2d03" alt=""
And yet, I have come to the realization
that for me, knowledge of things places yet another weight on my shoulders. No
longer can I wrap ignorance around myself, as though a shield against the stark
reality of the things out there. Things I would much rather not know and yet
curiosity begs that I find out. It always shocks me how willingly people throw
knowledge around as though not bearing any weight or repercussions. You see,
for me knowledge has repercussions, it has forced to me question long held
ideas, objective truths, as I considered them. I am unable to take anything at face
value without fully rationalizing it, and here I join Nietzsche in blaming
Socrates and Plato for steering the world towards rationalism. For how can one
have faith if they must rationalize everything they encounter. Isn’t faith
starkly opposed to this? Herein lies the dilemma of a young African Christian
in this post enlightenment period. The knowledge of things forces us to
question what we have been taught and what we long held as the inherent and unobjectionable
truth.
Thanks Louise for this post. Now that you've raised the issue of the dilemma we face when deciding how much rational we can be with religious matters and how much we should leave to faith alone. I hope your next post will give us a hint on your point of view :)
ReplyDelete