Saturday, October 11, 2014

PRAYER FOR KENYAN RUNNERS OF CHICAGO MARATHON 2014



INTRODUCTION

        
Kenyan Chicago Marathon 2014 Runners
 
There is no athletic discipline more frequently mentioned in the history of our faith than running.   The Lord declared all of His creation is good (Genesis 1.)   The glory of the young is in their strength (Proverbs 20:29.).   The Lord finds a special delight in runners.  The first to experience the Lord’s Resurrection was a woman, Mary Magdalene; and she ran in response.  His disciples ran to see the empty tomb, and the one most loved by the Lord, John was the first to reach the vacant grave (John 20.)  When New Testament writers explain discipline, perseverance, and determination their illustrations are of runners.  Eric Liddell, Olympian and missionary to China summarized God’s relationship with runners by saying, “
I believe God made me for a purpose, but he also made me fast. And when I run I feel His pleasure.”

          Thus we gather this evening as both young and old to remember that runners are
our heroes.  We hope our children will share your character as they mature.  As we age we delight in the beauty of your run as we wait for our resurrection bodies.  You remind us that neither Kenya nor Chicago is our final destination.   Heaven is our home.   We long to cross the finish line one last time and hear our Lord say, “Well done, good and faithful servant.”

CALL FOR RUNNERS TO STAND

Can all those planning to run in the Chicago Marathon please stand?

BLESSING
 
May you be surrounded by a great crowd

May you be free in body, mind, and spirit.

May you run the marked race.

May you persevere as you carry our hopes (Hebrews 12:1.)

May you run with purpose and determination.

May you run so that victory is your destiny (1 Corinthians 9:24-26.)

May you boast in the Lord with your success in this race (Philippians 2:16)

When the Lord returns to this earth may you run to tell us His Good News (John 20:2-4.)

LORD’S PRAYER IN KISWAHILI

Can we all stand as I read the Lord’s Prayer in Kiswahili?

‘Baba yetu uliye mbinguni jina lako litukuzwe.

 Ufalme wako uje, mapenzi yako yafanyike hapa duniani kama huko mbinguni.
Utupatie leo riziki yetu ya kila siku.
 Na utusamehe makosa yetu kama sisi tulivyokwisha kuwa samehe waliotukosea.
 Na usitutie majaribuni, bali utuokoe kutokana na yule mwovu,’
 Kwa kuwa Ufalme na nguvu na utukufu ni vyako milele. Amina.  
(Matayo 6:9-13Neno: Bibilia Takatifu (SNT)”

Sunday, October 5, 2014

Christianity and the Anti-Homosexuality Act (AHA): A reply to good friends



On September 15 2014 my good friend, Andrew Mwenda wrote in The Independent “AHA: A reply to “Christian” critics” http://www.independent.co.ug/the-last-word/the-last-word/9317?task=view  He raises many good points that are both Biblical and represent historic Christian teaching.  Yet, I think a deeper discussion is merited.  

            I’ve sat with Andrew in Monitor FM’s studio discussing our disagreements about Jesus’ virgin birth and resurrection.  I’ve never been able to forget the caller who said, “Hitler, Stalin, Amin, and Mwenda will all have a special place in hell.”  Wow.  I fear God’s judgment too much myself to declare it to another.

Social media now shows us how deeply engrained such sentiments are into misplaced theories
of Christianity.  Those commentaries miss what it means to be “Christian?”   Though our contemporary times frequently use the term, “Christian” it is only used in the Bible three times (Acts 11:26; 26:28; 1 Peter 4:16.)  Many scholars conclude this first usage of the word, “Christian” was actually an insult to those who believed in Jesus of Nazareth’s resurrection.  The second time is when an imprisoned Paul tries to persuade King Agrippa to believe, and King Agrippa flippantly asks, “Do you think that in such a short time you can persuade me to be a Christian?”  Lastly, Peter uses the word, “Christian” to explain suffering without shame.  Thus the very use of the name Christian should never entail a sense of towering over one’s opponent.  Instead to be “Christian” means coming to be near and suffer with those suffering.  It is in that relinquishment of hunger for human dominance that we become truly “Christian.”

As we suffer we process through faith.   How did we get here?   Why is this world so full of pain?  The Bible teaches that humanity is made in the image of God (Genesis 1:26, 27.)  All humanity possesses infinite dignity.  Yet, sin enters into the world (Genesis 3.)  Then all havoc breaks out.  Pain is part of life.  Our bodies fail.  Sickness catches us all.  Our work is frustrating.  The corrupt prosper.  All will die.  We can blame others for the mess of humanity.  However, we are all guilty (Romans 3.)  

The Bible speaks of a day coming when like the creepiest of science fiction movies not only will every deed be exposed, but every thought and motive will also be on display (Matthew 12; Luke 12; Hebrews 4:12.)  No one will come away blameless.  The Radio Katwe rumors of Rwanda may not be true, but Jesus makes it clear that somewhere in heaven is stack of files, photos, and videos of our most embarrassing moments.  We’ll all be on our knees begging for mercy when twitter leaks our secrets (Philippians 2:10.)  Thus the best we can do in this life is act justly, love mercy, and walk humbly (Micah 6:8.) 

            With such fear and trembling, but hope of forgiveness we live a Christian ethic that makes many friends (Luke 16:1-14,) and treats others as we want to be treated (Leviticus 19:18; Matthew 22:39; Mark 12:31-33; Luke 10:27.)  With this Christian ethic of shared suffering because of humanity’s shared failings I offer humble suggestions.

            First, can we stop the name calling?  An old pastor, Dr. Royce Dickinson once told me, “Always, describe people the way they describe themselves.  Otherwise we are name calling, and stripping people of their dignity.”  I’m using the word “gay” now as homosexual seems offensive.  When a few use courser language let us either ignore it or call it unacceptable to our civil community.  With the same reasoning, can we cease to use the term “homophone” or “homophobic?”  The terms assign the motive of fear and hate.   Let’s allow God to sift our motives.

            Second, Uganda is a sovereign nation.  She has the right to make her own laws.  History tells us only emperors try to tell sovereign nations what to do.  Those of us who don’t hold Ugandan citizenship can speak as friends offering advice (as Ugandans also speak to us.)  However, let us not take the place of God and attempt to direct history.   After all history calls those who attempted to direct history names such as “emperor” and “dictator.”  We wouldn’t want those name assigned to us.


            Third, Andrew, Fox Odoi, and others went to court and raised an important issue of justice.  The Anti-Homosexuality Act was passed in Uganda’s Parliament without quorum.  All laws that are just must be established by respecting constitutional process.  The Anti-Gay bill did not follow a just process.   

            Fourth, since we’re all guilty let us very cautiously offer anecdotal evidence of hypocrisy.  I’ve been a respected husband, father, uncle, coach, teacher, pastor, and mzee to my community, but I’m just as guilty of hypocrisy as any.  I’m thankful to all who treat my failings with grace.  

            Fifth, Andrew raises a contemporary Christian proverb, “Love the sinner.  Hate the sin.”  It’s a good attempt to live out a difficult Christian ethic.  Yet, I think Tony Campolo recently said it even better, “Love the sinner.  Hate my own sin.”

            Wow.  Preaching is a horrible task for those who have the courage to wrestling with their own hypocrisy.  Countless Scriptures have men and women speaking for God to indict cultures of sin.  Pastors are accountable to call, “Sin,” “Sin.”  Yet as they do that they know they are guilty of all they are addressing.  No wonder Isaiah said, “Woe to me (Isaiah 6:5-7.)”  Grace needs to continually be applied to our preaching against sin simply because the pastor needs so much of it.

         
   Paul said it well when he wrote, “Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men, nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.   And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God (1 Corinthians 6:9-11.)”

If Paul planted a church in Kampala it would be made up not only of reformed gays, but reformed street thieves, religious conmen, corrupt government officials, drunkards, bang smokers, and sensationalist journalists.  I hope Uganda’s pastors have similar visions today.

            Yes, Andrew gets it right that the best pastoring helps people become new.  Churches must   When we pastors don’t lead in the process of redemption we should repent before we demand another’s repentance.  Andrew also gets it right that Uganda is not a theocracy and Christianity is itself very divided on many issues related to gays.  Most importantly Andrew gets it right when he writes, “Jesus said he came to earth to save sinners, not to dine with the holy.”
Alexander McKay
lead in the process of human redemption.

            Yet, I think Andrew misses that a significant part of being a religious leader is being a prophet.  Contemporary health and wealth pastors miss it when they think being a prophet is profitable way to predict the future.  Instead being a prophet is a lone voice of truth to intimidating earthly authorities and howling mobs.  Uganda’s history has had many.  Some were missionaries like Alexander McKay who spoke against slavery, war, human sacrifice, and homosexuality.   Some were leaders like Bishop Festo Kivengere who with a pure heart proclaimed his love for Idi Amin while calling Amin’s killings evil.  

        
Bishop Festo Kivengere
   
Those voices of the past remind us again – The colonial impulse to control is wrong.  Sexuality should be practiced between a man and woman who are married.  Murder is a heinous sin.  We’re all guilty, but redemption is possible.  Thus we’ll preach not only on homosexuality with which a small percentage struggle, but also address our more pervasive sins of greed, prejudice, and lust.  We’re all part of the sin problem.

            Those prophets of old were advocates in policy debates.  Their voices should still be heard.  In a society where there are many religious thoughts we should listen well to all whether they are rabbi, guru, haji, or pastor.  Each represents millions who have found enduring truth in their religion.  We dare not make the mistake to exclude any just because religion is part of their reasoning.  In fact, we’ll find when we’re really in trouble frequently we’re healed at a religious hospital, educated by religious scholarships and schools, and someone we meet at a religious gathering helps us find a new job.  If we turn to religious leaders for health, education, and business it seems hypocritical to exclude them from participating as citizens in governance.

            Andrew closes his column with a story of a gay Christian in Uganda.  It’s heart breaking. 
How about if the next time I’m in Uganda Andrew and I go visit him with the same grace we give one another?  Friendship is about loving one another when we know each other’s failings.   Then we gently point to the ultimate friend, Jesus of Nazareth who ultimately makes us into something new. 
 
            Bottom line:  Andrew has well pointed out Biblical holes in the Anti-Homosexuality Act.  Yet, I think Andrew’s closing story is a whisper of God that a day will come when Andrew combines his journalistic excellence with a pastor’s calling.

Monday, September 8, 2014

AMERICAN MISSIONARY REFLECTIONS ON THE BOOM IN UGANDA ADOPTIONS



Last week I noticed some discussion on twitter concerning adoption in Uganda.    An article from AFP was circulating (http://www.theeastafrican.co.ke/news/Uganda-fears-for-children-as-overseas-adoptions-boom/-/2558/2439568/-/weogw2z/-/index.html?utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=twitterfeed) entitled, Uganda fears for children as overseas adoptions boom.”   The article quotes a front page headline of “AMERICANS RUSH TO ADOPT UGANDAN KIDS “by David Lumu  in Tuesday, September 2, 2014 New Vision.   (The article can be purchased at http://epaper.newvision.co.ug/login.aspx.)   After the front page headline the article takes up most of page 3 with the headline, “Alarm as foreigners adopt more Ugandan children.”

 


When I did a google and twitter search I came across a CNN article entitled Red flags wave over Uganda's adoption boom” by Todd Schwarzschild on March 2, 2013 (http://edition.cnn.com/2013/02/27/world/africa/wus-uganda-adoptions.) Then one quickly finds the common trends of those using the recent headlines to voice concerns about adoption such as (http://www.againstchildtrafficking.org/category/adoption-lobby-alert/) and a plethora of personal adoption blogs, adoption agency information, and feel good news promoting Americans adopting in Uganda.   (I chose not to list those sources so they can have the freedom to speak themselves.)  

 


            My family has adopted two children from Uganda.   We served
With Ruth and Timothy, June 2014
there as missionaries with New Testament Churches of Christ from 1993 to 2004.
   Following that we served with Christ’s Church of Rwanda from 2005 to 2012.   We have facilitated several Americans adopting, been adoption advocates, and at times been involved with East Africa’s media.   We’ve also been part of dialogue within international adoption discussions (http://hekimagreatlakesmessenger.blogspot.com/2013/08/missionary-reflections-on-kathryn.html.)  It seemed prudent to blog about this discussion.

 


OUR STORY


            For my wife, Jana and I our adoption journey began with both of us having adopted siblings.    Adoption was always on our radar.   When we first arrived in Uganda in 1993 we noticed the large numbers of orphans as a result of the AIDS epidemic, and considered personally adopting.    However, at the time only citizens of Common Wealth countries could adopt from Uganda.    In 1997 The Children’s Act was passed in Uganda.   There were many issues the legislation addressed.   It cautiously opened the door for those from Non-Common Wealth countries to adopt in Uganda.  We decided that this was a whisper from God to pursue adoption. 


            On October 29, 1999 we began fostering Mary Ruth Mirembe,
Jana and Ruth 2000
an infant girl after being contacted by Mama Joyce at Sanyu Babies Home in Namirembe Hill, Kampala, Uganda.   An advert with Mary Ruth Mirembe’s picture was run in Bukedde and no relatives came forward.    We obtained legal guardianship of Mary Ruth Mirembe so that we could travel with her in both East Africa and to the United States in relation to our missionary responsibilities.  On February 23, 2004 we adopted Mary Ruth Mirembe.    We traveled to the United States in October 2006 and our daughter, Ruth became a USA citizen.  As intended in the records of fostering, legal guardianship, and adoption she has grown up well educated and involved in our delightful Christian heritage of Uganda and East Africa.   


            Our African Christian heritage is one of inclusion of children
Ethan, Ruth, and Timothy at Lake Bunyonyi 2011
in difficult situations.
    A few years later Mama Joyce asked us to consider bringing another child into our home.   We began fostering Timothy David Sanyu on October 21, 2002.   We obtained legal guardianship on March 4, 2004 to facilitate travel in East Africa and to the United States for furlough.    On January 20, 2006 we adopted Timothy David Sanyu Jenkins.    He traveled with us like Ruth in October 2006 and became an American citizen.   As intended in our documentation he has been educated and nurtured by our wonderful Christian heritage that spans nations.


            Our family returned to the United States from Rwanda, Africa in June, 2012 to serve as missionaries in Chicago land.   Ruth is currently enrolled in ninth grade at UNO Charter High School in Rogers Park, Chicago.  She excels in photography and dance.


            Timothy is enrolled in sixth grade in Waters Elementary Magnet School in Chicago.   He was diagnosed at 10 months old with a minor case of cerebral palsy.    Yet, Timothy has fast feet, rhythm, and Ugandan determination.   He excels in soccer and plays on travel teams.


Ethan playing with Chicago Uganda Cranes
            Our family is members of Ugandan cultural associations in Chicago.   We pay our yearly membership dues, attend most functions, and occasionally provide some pastoral care.    Our other Ugandan born son, Ethan plays soccer for the Chicago Uganda Cranes team.  Some who may not know our community well conclude that we “bless Uganda.”   With all due respect we disagree.   We have been immensely blessed by Uganda.   If we offer any blessings to others it is us simply passing on the goodness Uganda so graciously gave to us.    


OLD CONCERNS


            The boom in adoption is likely a fly wheel gaining momentum.    Few Americans were adopting in Uganda when we began the journey.   We were featured on UTV’s “Open Up” show with Irene Kulabako.    Relate Magazine ran an article on our adoption.    Elizabeth Kameo wrote an article in The Weekly Observer related to the need to provide extra care for children with disabilities that discussed our journey with Timothy’s cerebral palsy.   


            The non-Ugandans we knew when the journey began who adopted were those with deep Uganda roots.   Most were long-term missionaries.   A few were business people.   


            While The Children’s Act did open the path for non-Ugandans to adopt it required a 3 year residency in Uganda and 3 years of fostering before the adoption could be completed (http://ugandansadopt.ug/faq/.)  The length of time to complete an adoption was a concern of some.  Yet, it made great pragmatic sense for a nation with few means of doing extensive background checks.   A Ugandan friend told us, “We don’t want people taking our children like chickens in the market.”   Our old missionary mentors had counseled that cultural understanding would take 3 years.  If Ugandan children were to be raised by those who honored Ugandan culture a 3 years residence made sense.    


            Some advocated that with so many children in vulnerable situations the process should be streamlined.   Yet most of the non-Ugandans arguing for a stream lined process represented the beginnings of the waves of short-term missions (volunteerism.)   


            In fact, I had some very pointed conversations with foreign residents of Uganda who had great concerns with the slow process.   From my perspective most of those with great concerns were those whose Uganda experience had been disappointing.   They had found a child to adopt and now wanted to depart Uganda as soon as possible.


            Many of us processed legal guardianship so we could travel easily between the nations that our African livelihood took us.   However, a few families were processing legal guardianship in what American jargon calls, “An end around.”   It was a loop hole to avoid staying in Uganda 3 years and respecting the intent of Uganda’s leaders.


            I distinctly remember telling several who I perceived to be running an
end around, “The gospel requires for us to treat Uganda’s government with honor (Romans 13:1-7.)  It is true that you have found a child that needs a family.   It is not true that the Uganda government is stopping you from adopting that child.   The Uganda government is asking for you to respect their culture in the process.   Yes, some in the Uganda government are corrupt.   Yet, this 3 year residency is not about corruption.   In fact, by you going around the intent you encourage corruption.   A time will come when an honest government official goes through the adoption records and finds inconsistencies.   Some will be held to account.  Will the cost at that time be less vulnerable children in families?   Please put down a 3 year root in Uganda.”


VALID CONCERNS


Last week’s New Vision told how Uganda’s Attorney General John Muwanga had come to a similar conclusion.   I believe he has valid concerns.  The process is irregular.  There is no mechanism within the Ugandan government to monitor the trend.  The numbers don’t match up.   For instance, while there are records of 576 Americans adopting Ugandan children only 333 adoptions are registered during the studied time.  The legal guardianship process allows those who don’t qualify to adopt in Uganda to adopt Ugandan children outside of Uganda.   A side effect of what appears to be a growing adoption industry in Uganda is a growing number of baby and children homes that now total over 500.


Such concerns raise fears of child trafficking and abuse.   


Also, the children’s homes that support the adoption industry will leave many children who do have extended family disconnected from their community.    Consistent research concludes such children will suffer from a wide range of social and psychological issues.   


It is the responsibility of Uganda’s government to protect Uganda’s children.   The Attorney General’s recommendations of clear adoption and legal guardianship guidelines are needed.   (For more insightful reading on the subject see http://www.thewayforwardproject.org/file_uploads/U01%20Interim%20Report%20on%20Adoption%20Status%20in%20Uganda.pdf.) 


MISSIONARY SUGGESTIONS


            My experience has been that with headlines, partisan dynamics outside
of Uganda, volunteerism, and industrial economics sometimes adoption discussions polarize beyond reason.   In that process vulnerable children are frequently the loser.   Thus I offer the following missionary suggestions.


            First, take a deep breath.  Examine the facts.   Listen with compassion.  Act with grace.  A quick reaction will wound many. 


            Second, think about long-term consequence.  I once heard a seasoned missionary in a discussion about caring for vulnerable children say, “If you want to increase the numbers of orphans in a community build an orphanage.”  He was right.   Once the institution of an orphanage is functioning extended families struggling to economically care for their children will turn to the easy fix.   Yet, the process has horrific consequences.   Besides isolation we must consider the stigmatization of being an “orphan” in a society where the basic social building block is the extended family.    Conversely, a few children in Uganda have absolutely no extended family to care for them.  In a quick reaction to stifle an industry we take away adoption options for those children.


            Third, though Americans and short-term missionaries have greatly contributed to this anomaly, it is Uganda’s responsibility to deal with her vulnerable children.   Those who must craft new procedures are Ugandan.  We from other locations must exercise restraint.  God’s Holy Spirit moves in Ugandan hearts just as it moves in American ones.   God will direct this discussion to His intent.  One of those intents will be for Ugandans to lead in adoption of Ugandan children (http://ugandansadopt.ug/.)   Ugandan Diaspora may be particularly of help here as their remittances are Uganda’s largest source of foreign income.   We should never sell the Ugandan people short on their capacity to reason and create solutions. 


            Fourth, though difficult following process is a must.  The current discussion has been created by many who chose to rush and not follow process.    The process should prioritize reuniting children with their extended family.   Next it should prioritize adoption of Ugandan children by Ugandans.   Then it should place Ugandan children with no family in non-Ugandan families for adoption.


            Lastly, this discussion calls those of us who believe in Jesus of
Nazareth’s resurrection to live the Gospel.   Old Testament texts are rich with metaphors of adoption to describe God’s relationship with Israel (Psalm 68:5; Ezekiel 16.)   Paul uses adoption as metaphor of the Gospel (Romans 8:15; 8:23; 9:24; Galatians 4:5; Ephesians 1:5.)   Thus when process is followed and children with no adults in their lives are part of our world community it is the responsibility of those who believe in the Gospel to adopt them into our family.


May we live with the grace and wisdom of God’s Holy Spirit in that process.